The #Trexit Conversation
I’ll be leading a panel discussion at OER17 called Open Education in a time of Trump and Brexit. Joining me in the panel live at the conference will be Maha Bali (@bali_maha), Lorna Campbell (@LornaMCampbell), and Martin Weller (@mweller). While we four could easily carry on a lively discussion for 80 minutes (some would say I could jabber that long myself), I wanted to bring in additional perspectives. To that end, I have enlisted the help of a few people to provide different perspectives to get the conversation going. These people, Robin DeRosa, Nadine Aboulmagd, Chris Gilliard, and David Kernohan, unfortunately couldn’t attend the conference in person, but they’ve kindly provided us video statements intended to help provoke the discussion and stimulate our collective thinking and learning. I’ve embedded those video statements below in this post.
I know many, perhaps most or even all, open educators have thought about the implications of the Trump election, the Brexit referendum, and other political movements for open education and OER. I hope this panel can help stimulate a wider and deeper discussion and sharing of ideas. Feel free to participate on Twitter with the hashtags #trexit #oer17. Or, add your comments here or blog them yourself.
The original motivation for this panel discussion came from private discussions among some of us just after the US presidential election in November 2016. We thought those discussions should be expanded and made more open. After all, one of the core values of the open education movement is that more participation and open involvement improves the outcomes, right? Hence, this panel discussion with the open education community at OER17. The original proposal for this panel discussion stated:
Like the Internet itself, the Open Education movement, including OER and OEP, has grown in a world of globalised capitalism that has been dominant in North America and Europe, and indeed, developed and growing economies. The Brexit vote, Donald Trump’s election, and shifts toward nationalist-right parties elsewhere are changing the political landscape. At a minimum, the rhetoric of these movements, both in support and opposition, has altered public discourse and often attitudes toward higher education. These political shifts have complex and multifaceted implications for the open education movement.
At the OER17 conference in London, our panel aims to stimulate deeper thought beyond our initial reactions to these political movements. We hope to provide different perspectives on the relationship between Open Education and the political changes represented by Brexit and the Trump election. Many questions arise, including:
- What challenges do these political movements pose for Open Education? What opportunities?
- Open Education movement has largely embraced values of inclusiveness, sharing, connectedness, equity, voice, agency, and openness. How might these values be furthered under these new regimes? How might these values be hindered?
- Will our work in the open education movement change?
- In what ways can we shape the future of the Open Education Movement?
When considering the relationship between Trump/Brexit and the OER/ open education movements, it is tempting to think in narrow terms. We’re tempted to see think first of funding implications, academic freedom concerns, or wavering support for education as a public good. These are valid concerns. But as our three “provocateers” suggest, there’s more to the intersection of Trump/Brexit and OER/Open Education than we might think at first. It’s complex.
Robin DeRosa, (@actualham), suggests we observe and consider the parallels between the larger political environment and the environments we create in the classroom. (4:47 min)
Nadinne Aboulmagd, (@NadinneAbo), provides a close-up insight into some challenges the Trump administration policies create for open scholarship. Note: Nadinne was prevented from creating the video at the last minute due to illness but has very generously shared her script for the video here.
Chris Gilliard, (@hypervisible), notes the role of surveillance and monitoring and urges us to think of open as in freedom. (2:28 min)
David Kernohan, @dkernohan, takes a look at the “roaming auto-didacts” involved in the Trump/Brexit movements and considers what open education/OER did and did not contribute.
At this point, we’ll insert insightful and witty commentary from our panelists.
UPDATE: After I put this blog post together but just before the panel started, we received the video from Nadinne (who went beyond the call of duty!). I wanted to include it:
One thought on “Open Ed, Trump, Brexit”
Thanks again for proposing this session and for inviting me to it. I think our choices of virtual folks to do provocations was amazing and resulted in some really rich questions and the videos themselves count as OERs now! I posted the link to this blogpost and to the Periscope Autumm did on the conference website so it would be easy for folks to find. You could also update your blogpost to link to or embed the Periscope, if you like? It was lovely meeting u and your wife.
Comments are closed.